Greater resilience in RPA is primarily achieved through which approach?

Greater resilience in RPA is primarily achieved through the functional approach. This approach focuses on breaking down the automation process into distinct functions or operations that can be managed and updated independently. By organizing automation workflows in this manner, it becomes easier to identify and address issues that may arise, as each function can be tested and modified without impacting the entire workflow.

This modularity allows for quicker adaptation to changes, whether they are due to updates in the applications being automated or changes in business processes. It's also beneficial in maintaining hardware and software compatibility over time, which enhances the overall robustness of the automation solution.

In contrast, other approaches may not offer the same level of flexibility or ease of modification. For example, layered configuration might introduce complexity with managing different layers of functionality, while object-oriented and data-oriented approaches may not prioritize the individual function management that contributes to resilience. Each of these alternative approaches tends to be more focused on structure or specifics of data, which does not address the adaptability and integrity of the RPA system as directly as the functional approach does.